Instructional Challenges Encountered by Grade 6 ESP Teachers in Implementing Role-Playing Activities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23722687Keywords:
time constraints, student engagement, values education, metacognition, qualitative interviewsAbstract
Role-playing offers Grade 6 learners opportunities to explore values through realistic situations, but classroom constraints may limit the quality of these activities. This study describes implementation challenges reported by Edukasyon sa Pagpapakatao teachers in a public elementary school in Tagbilaran City, Philippines. A descriptive-qualitative approach was used to examine interviews with five purposively selected Grade 6 teachers. The researchers used a content-validated, five-item interview guide, pilot-tested the questions, manually transcribed responses, and applied thematic analysis. Two major challenges emerged: limited preparation time and difficulty sustaining equitable participation. Teachers described forty-five-minute class sessions, insufficient practice opportunities, and competing demands during group performances. They also identified pupil shyness, varying confidence and acting skills, and unequal involvement when more confident group members dominated planning and performance. These conditions could reduce opportunities for thoughtful engagement with values-related situations and post-performance reflection. Findings reflect teachers’ experiences rather than direct observation or measured changes in students’ metacognition. The accounts suggest practical ways to improve role-playing implementation, including additional preparation time, clearer group responsibilities, targeted encouragement, and protected reflection periods. Future studies should examine these adjustments in other schools and include pupil perspectives and classroom observations. The findings underscore logistical and participation barriers as important considerations in planning reflective role-playing activities for values education.
Downloads
References
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Gillies, R. M. (2016). Cooperative learning: Review of research and practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n3.3
Gönül, G., Tsalas, N., & Paulus, M. (2021). The effect of time pressure on metacognitive control: Developmental changes in self-regulation and efficiency during learning. Metacognition and Learning, 16(2), 459–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-021-09262-y
Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2023). A step-by-step process of thematic analysis to develop a conceptual model in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231205789
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Rashid, S., & Qaisar, S. (2017). Role play: A productive teaching strategy to promote critical thinking. Bulletin of Education and Research, 39(2), 197–213. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1210125
van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Marian Julia D. Clarin, Lei Marie A. Oludin, Jocelyn A. Quijada, Laila Marie B. Real, Zandra Mae G. Sevidan, Chrystel Mariz R. Gementiza (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.