The Effectiveness of the Thematic Integration of Music, Arts, Physical Education, and Health (MAPEH) in Grades 4 and 5 in Nabua West District, Division of Camarines Sur

Authors

  • Robert N. Lontayao University of Northeastern Philippines Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23293561

Keywords:

interdisciplinary instruction, curriculum integration, elementary education, teacher perceptions, instructional coherence, learner motivation, school-based policy, MATATAG Curriculum

Abstract

This study examined teachers’ assessments of thematic integration in Music, Arts, Physical Education, and Health (MAPEH) in Grades 4 and 5 in Nabua West District, Division of Camarines Sur, during school year 2025–2026. Using a descriptive–evaluative–inferential survey design, it assessed perceived integration in relation to critical thinking, problem-solving, memory retention, learner motivation, and collaboration; examined perceived effectiveness for instructional practice; compared rank-order assessments; and developed policy recommendations. All 34 Grade 4 and Grade 5 MAPEH teachers from 17 elementary schools participated, comprising 17 teachers from each grade level. A researcher-developed, five-point questionnaire collected responses. Weighted means, ranking, descriptive distributions, and Mann–Whitney U tests were reported, with a nominal significance level of .05. Perceived thematic integration averaged 3.68 (Much Evident), with Grade 4 teachers reporting 3.90 and Grade 5 teachers reporting 3.46. Learner motivation ranked highest (3.83), while problem-solving ranked lowest (3.49). Perceived instructional effectiveness averaged 3.70 (Much Effective), including 3.94 for Grade 4 and 3.46 for Grade 5; enhancing integration ranked highest (3.89), and teacher collaboration lowest (3.45). The detailed statistical tables indicated significant rank-order differences for three learner-related domains and four instructional domains, but not for the remaining domains. Findings support targeted collaborative planning, coherent theme identification, curricular alignment, and district monitoring. Because findings represent teacher perceptions rather than directly measured pupil outcomes, the study establishes perceived implementation and effectiveness, not causal learning gains.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Beane, J. A. (1997). Curriculum integration: Designing the core of democratic education. Teachers College Press.

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press.

Department of Education. (2023). Adoption of the National Learning Recovery Program in the Department of Education (DepEd Order No. 013, s. 2023). https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/DO_s2023_013.pdf

Drake, S. M., & Burns, R. C. (2004). Meeting standards through integrated curriculum. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Drake, S. M., & Reid, J. L. (2018). Integrated curriculum as an effective way to teach 21st century capabilities. Asia Pacific Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.30777/APJER.2018.1.1.03

Fogarty, R. (2009). How to integrate the curricula (3rd ed.). Corwin Press.

Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.

Gardner, H. (2011). The unschooled mind: How children think and how schools should teach. Basic Books.

Hargreaves, A., & O’Connor, M. T. (2018). Collaborative professionalism: When teaching together means learning for all. Corwin Press.

Jacobs, H. H. (2013). Curriculum 21: Essential education for a changing world. ASCD.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Allyn & Bacon.

Kysilka, M. L. (1998). Understanding integrated curriculum. The Curriculum Journal, 9(2), 197–209.

Mann, H. B., & Whitney, D. R. (1947). On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18(1), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177730491

Marzano, R. J. (2017). The new art and science of teaching: More than fifty new instructional strategies for academic success. Solution Tree Press.

Murdoch, K., & Hornsby, D. (2016). Planning curriculum connections: Whole-school planning for integrated curriculum. Eleanor Curtain Publishing.

Republic of the Philippines. (2001). Republic Act No. 9155: Governance of Basic Education Act of 2001. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph

Republic of the Philippines. (2013). Republic Act No. 10533: Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph

Slavin, R. E. (2015). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Allyn & Bacon.

Vars, G. F. (2014). Effects of interdisciplinary curriculum integration on student achievement and engagement. Middle School Journal, 45(4), 12–19.

Wilcoxon, F. (1945). Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bulletin, 1(6), 80–83. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001968

Research Articles Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): October Issue

Downloads

Published

2026-10-11

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Similar Articles

1-10 of 92

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.