Aral Reading Program and Reading Skills DevelopmentAmong Elementary Learners

Authors

  • Joldyn C. Cayari Northeastern College, Santiago City, Isabela, Philippines Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23410896

Keywords:

ARAL Reading Program, elementary education, reading fluency, word recognition, reading comprehension, literacy intervention, pre-test and post-test assessment

Abstract

This study examined reading skills development among elementary learners participating in the Academic Recovery and Accessible Learning (ARAL) Reading Program in Lasam West District, Schools Division of Cagayan, Philippines. Specifically, it assessed changes in reading fluency, word recognition, and reading comprehension following an eight-week intervention period. A quantitative descriptive research design involving paired pre-test and post-test assessments was employed among 67 learners from Grades 1 to 6. Reading assessments were personally administered by the researcher using Department of Education reading materials. Reading fluency was measured through correct words per minute, while word recognition and reading comprehension were assessed using 10-item and five-item measures, respectively. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, paired-samples t-tests, and supplementary Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Results revealed increases in mean reading fluency from 50.09 to 57.78 correct words per minute, word recognition from 4.87 to 6.00, and reading comprehension from 2.22 to 2.78. Statistically significant differences were observed across all three reading dimensions (p < .001). Individual progress analysis showed improvements in reading fluency among 79.1% of learners, word recognition among 70.1%, and reading comprehension among 49.3%. Although overall performance improved, variations in individual progress indicated continuing instructional needs, particularly in reading comprehension. The absence of a comparison group limits causal attribution of these improvements to the program. The findings provide localized evidence to support differentiated reading instruction, systematic progress monitoring, and targeted intervention enhancement to address learners' varying reading needs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618772271

Department of Education. (2025). Implementing guidelines for the Academic Recovery and Accessible Learning Program in Reading for Key Stages 1 to 3 (DepEd Memorandum No. 064, s. 2025). https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/DM_s2025_064r.pdf

Downs, J., & Mohr, K. A. (2025). A multilevel meta-analysis of synchronous paired oral reading techniques in elementary classrooms. Literacy Research and Instruction, 64(1), 84–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2024.2319654

Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(2), 167–188. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0902_4

Foorman, B., Beyler, N., Borradaile, K., Coyne, M., Denton, C. A., Dimino, J., Furgeson, J., Hayes, L., Henke, J., Justice, L., Keating, B., Lewis, W., Sattar, S., Streke, A., Wagner, R., & Wissel, S. (2016). Foundational skills to support reading for understanding in kindergarten through 3rd grade (NCEE 2016-4008). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/PracticeGuide/21

Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104

Hall, C., Dahl-Leonard, K., Cho, E., Solari, E. J., Capin, P., Conner, C. L., Henry, A. R., Cook, L., Hayes, L., Vargas, I., Richmond, C. L., & Kehoe, K. F. (2023). Forty years of reading intervention research for elementary students with or at risk for dyslexia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 58(2), 285–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.477

Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163

LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6(2), 293–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(74)90015-2

Mejala, J. R. (2024). Early language reading interventions and reading skills of elementary grade one pupils in Zambales, Philippines. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 5(3), 829–837. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.05.03.08

National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. https://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/nrp/smallbook

National Research Council. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children (C. E. Snow, M. S. Burns, & P. Griffin, Eds.). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/6023

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 results (volume I and II): Country notes—Philippines. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2022-results-volume-i-and-ii-country-notes_ed6fbcc5-en/philippines_a0882a2d-en.html

Rasinski, T. V. (2004). Assessing reading fluency. Pacific Resources for Education and Learning. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED483166.pdf

Republic Act No. 12028. (2024). An act establishing an Academic Recovery and Accessible Learning (ARAL) Program and appropriating funds therefor. https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/2/97912

Vaughn, S., Gersten, R., Dimino, J., Taylor, M. J., Newman-Gonchar, R., Krowka, S., Kieffer, M. J., McKeown, M., Reed, D., Sanchez, M., St. Martin, K., Wexler, J., Morgan, S., Yañez, A., & Jayanthi, M. (2022). Providing reading interventions for students in grades 4–9 (WWC 2022007). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/PracticeGuide/29

Research Articles Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): October Issue

Downloads

Published

2026-10-16

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Similar Articles

1-10 of 92

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.