Innovation and Employee Productivity in Selected Private Higher Education Institutions in Laoag City: A Descriptive-Correlational Study

Authors

  • Roger Morillo, MBA, CMP Northwestern University, Philippines Author
  • Jerry Castro Jr. Northwestern University, Philippines Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23628024

Keywords:

employee productivity, process innovation, technological innovation, product innovation, higher education, Technology Acceptance Model, organizational processes, Philippines

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between technological, process, and product innovation and employee productivity among employees of selected private higher education institutions (HEIs) in Laoag City, Philippines. It also examined whether age, sex, educational attainment, job tenure, and nature of work moderated the innovation–productivity relationship and developed a strategic action plan for institutional utilization of the findings. The participants were 271 full-time academic and non-academic employees from selected private HEIs. The findings showed that the institutions reported high levels of technological, process, and product innovation and high employee productivity. Process innovation had the strongest positive and statistically significant relationship with employee productivity, while technological innovation had a statistically significant but weaker positive relationship. Product innovation did not have a statistically significant relationship with employee productivity. None of the demographic characteristics significantly moderated the innovation–productivity relationship. The study recommends institutionalizing feasible policies for process innovation, strengthening technology utilization and responsible artificial intelligence integration, refining academic programs through Business Analytics and Artificial Intelligence in Research Methods, and establishing participatory and governance mechanisms that can sustain innovation within existing institutional resources.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aghion, P., Akcigit, U., & Howitt, P. (2021). The impact of technological advancements on productivity and economic growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 35(4), 75-98.

Amabile, T. M., & Pratt, M. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.001

Anderson, R. G., & Patel, S. K. (2022). Employee productivity and Innovation in a dynamic work environment. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 33(3), 289–310.

Asio, J. M. R. (2021). Determinants of work productivity among selected tertiary education employees: A PreCOVID-19 pandemic analysis. International Journal of Didactical Studies, 2(1), 101455. https://doi.org/10.33902/IJODS.2021167470

Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. I. (2023). Workplace innovation and employee engagement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 44(1), 25-42.

Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2021). Transformational leadership and organizational Innovation. Leadership Quarterly, 32(1), 12-28.

Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J., & Ying, Z. J. (2021). Does working from home improve productivity? Evidence from a large-scale experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 136(2), 805–849.

Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. W. W. Norton & Company.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2022). Self-determination theory: Employee autonomy and workplace innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(5), 945-960.

Demsas, J. (2025). The paradox of automation: Does technological Innovation improve or harm job satisfaction? Harvard Business Review, 103(1), 78–89.

Field, A. (2022). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Fuller, R. (2014, November 17). A primer on measuring employee engagement. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2014/11/a-primer-on-measuring-employee-engagement

Garcia, M. L., & Chen, T. Y. (2021). Lean management and process innovation: Effects on organizational efficiency. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 41(6), 789-805.

Garcia, M. L., & Lee, R. P. (2023). Innovation-driven productivity: The role of AI and digital transformation in modern businesses. Journal of Business Strategy, 44(3), 177-195.

Garcia, M. L., & Lopez, R. M. (2024). The relationship between workplace innovation and employee productivity. Human Resource Management Journal, 34(1), 45-59.

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2022). Performance analytics and employee monitoring: Enhancing accountability through data-driven insights. Harvard Business School Press.

Lee, H. Y., & Kim, S. J. (2023). Product innovation and customer satisfaction in the digital age. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 40(2), 156-170.

Lee, J., Park, Y., & Shin, D. (2023). Technology-induced stress: Challenges in workplace innovation adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 138, 107–125.

Leonardi, P. M., Neeley, T. B., & Gerber, E. (2022). Digital collaboration and its effect on productivity and efficiency in remote work. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 50(3), 267–289.

Nguyen, T. K., & Tran, P. Q. (2022). Process innovation and its effect on operational efficiency in manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Economics, 235, 108-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108460

Patel, A., & Rivera, M. (2024). Fostering a culture of Innovation: Employee involvement in product development and its impact on productivity. Journal of Business and Psychology, 39(1), 112–135.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper & Brothers.

Sime, H., & Tadesse, B. (2025). Innovation and workforce productivity: A sectoral analysis in African economies. African Journal of Economic Policy, 18(1), 99-124.

Smith, J. A., & Doe, R. L. (2021). The impact of technological Innovation on organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 124, 123-134.

Teece, D. J. (2022). Dynamic capabilities and innovation-driven competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 43(1), 1–23.

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2022). User acceptance of technology: Advancements in TAM research. MIS Quarterly, 46(1), 67-91.

Wüthrich-Grossenbacher, U. (2024, April 4). How employers can create a thriving workplace. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/mhi/our-insights/thriving-workplaces-how-employers-can-improve-productivity-and-change-lives

Research Articles Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): October Issue

Downloads

Published

2026-10-25

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Similar Articles

1-10 of 96

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.